In questo sito possono essere usati cookie per garantire una ottimale fruizione dei suoi servizi.

Italian Wines and Spirits
Menu

Select your language

Select your language

Il sistema informatico di ITALIANWINESANDSPIRITS.COM  e ENOPRESS.IT  ci consentono di ricevere e pubblicare i comunicati in tutti i loro elementi: testo, foto, immagini, link, video, ecc. Per agevolarne l'inserimento si prega di seguire questi SUGGERIMENTI

 
 
I thought I'd add a few thoughts here.
 
Why are margins low - and lower than for spirits and beer?
 
Largely because wine is generally sold on the basis of the place where it was produced and/or the grape variety from which it was made.
 
In both cases, there will be many - tens, hundreds, thousands; tens, maybe hundreds, of thousands - of wines in the same shaped bottle with the same word on their label. The customer is supposed to understand the difference between Lidl or Aldi Chablis and the one on offer from Berry Bros & Rudd.
 
This understanding that is made harder by
 
a) the sophistication of the labelling used by the retailer
 
b) the customer's lack of confidence in their own ability to judge wine
 
c) the frequency with which the cheaper wine will have some kind of reassuring medal or score
 
The supermarket is able to offer its wines at attractively low prices because
 
1) the large number of examples on offer drives prices down (producers ask for the 'going rate' or a bit less)
 
2) they are buying in large volumes
 
3) their costs are lower than for a specialist retailer (wine is just a section in a large store)
 
4) customers are happy to buy private label wines (which experience and occasional critical praise have led them to trust)
 
5) they don't need to make a profit (wine can be a loss-leader/footfall builder that attracts customers who also buy more profitable detergent, carrots and dog food)
 
The (over) reliance on this kind of distribution - and monopoly tenders - creates an expectation of low prices among consumers ("why pay €/$20 or €/$30 for a bottle, when I can get something perfectly decent for €/$5-10?"). This is in contrast to spirits, which are associated with - pricy - on-trade consumption and, more crucially, are well marketed and branded.
 

The industry average for marketing still wine in Europe is 3-8% of net sales, a figure that leaves little to spend for many wineries once they have covered the costs of attending events like Wine Paris and ProWein. entering a few competitions and sending out samples to journalists. (The figures are higher in the US - see chart below)

Worse still, some of that marketing budget will fund promotional discounting by retailers which, of course further reduces the perceived value of the wine among shoppers who only buy it when it is on offer.

For most, while the poor margins are seen as a problem, the lack of marketing funds are far less of a concern ("my wine is good and good wine sells itself.").

In Europe, wineries benefit from subsidies and often rely on local generic bodies to do some of their marketing for them. Which leads to them presenting their wines alongside their neighbours at trade events where buyers can move from producer to producer until they find the combination of acceptable quality and price.

Apart from attending events at which they can pour their wine, marketing, for these producers - the vast majority, globally - often historically largely consists of offering it to critics in the hope of a good review.

Naturally, some critics then exacerbate the problem by telling their audiences that "this is a really good wine, but an alternative from a nearby producer is nearly as good and much cheaper."

Which brings us to the image at the top of this post.

Low margins -> low budget -> weak marketing -> weak brand -> low margins

Some producers escape this trap.

They either make small volumes of such high quality wine that supermarkets are irrelevant and prices are driven up by demand. (Welcome to the Côte d'Or and Brunello).

Contenuto dell’articolo
These marketing figures include A&P, salesforce and trade programmes, promotions, discounts, trade and consumer events, media (paid and unpaid), sponsorship, general public relations.

Or they treat their wine as though it were a spirit or a premium sparkling wine. Which, in Champagne at least, is often produced by companies that also make spirits, and apply the same rules when it comes to margins, marketing and brand-building.

 

It is no accident that LVMH chose to invest in Cloudy Bay and Whispering Angel. Both are relatively expensive, brilliantly-packaged, marketed, branded wines that attract loyal, price-insensitive customers in the same way as that giant's Champagne brands like Veuve Clicquot.

The brilliance of brands like these is that they transcend the price squabbles that affect the vast majority of other wines on the market. Like Tito's Vodka, Audi and Apple, the marketing behind them has created an emotional appeal that makes their premium prices almost irrelevant.

And no amount of critical comment that Tito's is not handmade, or that some Audi models are just Volkswagens with smart badges, or that a cheap Chinese phone or tablet does the same job as an iPhone or iPad, or that not all Whispering Angel's grapes are grown on the estate, is going to deter the target customer from buying the brand they know and, yes, love.

But, if you're not lucky enough to own a few hectares in Pommard or Pomerol, you'd better find good ways to create and build those kinds of relationships with your customers (possibly through DTC), if you don't want to remain trapped in the vinous vicious circle.